Fans Think One MLB Contract Is The Worst In Baseball
Every offseason, Major League Baseball hands out massive contracts.
Superstars sign deals worth hundreds of millions of dollars, franchises commit to players for a decade or more, and every blockbuster signing immediately sparks one question:
Will the contract actually be worth it?
Sometimes the answer is obvious.
The player becomes a superstar, helps bring championships, and the contract ages beautifully.
Other times…
Fans begin wondering if their team made a huge mistake.
That’s exactly what sparked one of baseball’s biggest debates when fans were asked one simple question:
Which MLB contract is the worst in baseball?
The responses poured in.
Some fans defended their favorite players.
Others argued certain deals have become impossible to justify.
While several contracts were criticized, one answer appeared far more than the rest.
One Contract Dominated The Conversation
The contract fans brought up the most?
Anthony Rendon.
To be clear, almost nobody questioned how great Rendon was during the prime of his career.
He was one of baseball’s best hitters and played a major role in helping Washington win a World Series.
The criticism wasn’t about what he accomplished.
It was about everything that happened after signing his massive contract.
One fan wrote:
“Great player before the contract. Nightmare after it.”
Another added:
“Every year it feels like he’s hurt.”
Whether fair or unfair, Rendon’s deal became the most common answer throughout the discussion.
Why Fans Keep Bringing Up Anthony Rendon
The biggest issue wasn’t talent.
When healthy, few questioned Rendon’s ability.
Instead, fans focused on availability.
Several commenters argued that injuries have prevented him from making the impact expected from one of baseball’s highest-paid players.
Others pointed to the size of the contract itself.
When a franchise commits hundreds of millions of dollars, expectations naturally become enormous.
Some fans felt those expectations simply haven’t been met.
Supporters pushed back.
They argued injuries are part of sports and shouldn’t automatically define a player’s legacy or contract.
Still, the criticism remained loud.
Javier Báez Also Received Plenty Of Votes
Another player mentioned repeatedly was Javier Báez.
Many fans acknowledged how exciting Báez can be when he’s playing at his best.
However, critics questioned whether his offensive production has consistently matched the financial commitment made by his team.
One commenter wrote:
“The contract aged fast.”
Others defended Báez by pointing out that elite defense still provides value and that every player goes through difficult stretches.
His contract became one of the biggest talking points in the discussion.
Kris Bryant Sparked Debate
Another contract that came up frequently belonged to Kris Bryant.
Fans remembered Bryant’s incredible early career and the success he enjoyed in Chicago.
But some argued injuries have prevented him from living up to expectations since signing his current deal.
Supporters immediately responded.
They pointed out that injuries are impossible to predict when teams hand out long-term contracts.
Like many players in the discussion, opinions were divided.
Even Carlos Correa Was Mentioned
Several fans also brought up Carlos Correa.
Not because they questioned his talent.
Instead, some wondered whether the size of his contract automatically places enormous expectations on every season.
Others argued Correa has consistently proven himself when healthy and shouldn’t be included in conversations about the league’s worst contracts.
His inclusion showed that almost every expensive deal eventually receives criticism.
Why Long-Term Contracts Are So Risky
One interesting theme kept appearing throughout the debate.
Baseball contracts are often judged years after they’re signed.
A deal that looks incredible on Day 1 can look completely different five years later.
Players age.
Injuries happen.
Performance changes.
That’s why even smart front offices sometimes end up with contracts fans regret.
Baseball simply involves too many unknowns.
Expectations Change Everything
The larger the contract…
The bigger the expectations.
Fans don’t expect a player making superstar money to simply be good.
They expect All-Star seasons.
MVP-caliber production.
Postseason heroics.
When those expectations aren’t met, criticism comes quickly.
That’s exactly why discussions like this become so heated.
Every Fan Defines “Worst Contract” Differently
Not everyone judged contracts the same way.
Some fans focused entirely on injuries.
Others cared more about declining performance.
Some looked at total salary.
Others judged whether the player helped the team win.
Because everyone values different things, there was never going to be one universally accepted answer.
That’s exactly what made the discussion so entertaining.
Why Baseball Fans Love These Debates
Money changes expectations.
The moment a player signs a massive contract, every slump becomes bigger.
Every injury becomes a headline.
Every disappointing season gets magnified.
Fans naturally compare production with salary.
When those two don’t seem to match, conversations like this explode online.
That’s why debates about contracts never really disappear.
Final Thoughts
When fans debated the worst contract in baseball, Anthony Rendon appeared more than almost anyone else.
That doesn’t necessarily mean his contract is objectively the worst.
It simply reflects how strongly many fans feel about long-term deals that haven’t produced the results they expected.
Whether it’s Rendon, Javier Báez, Kris Bryant, Carlos Correa, or another MLB star entirely, every baseball fan has a different opinion on which contract has aged the worst.
One thing is certain:
Nothing gets baseball fans arguing faster than asking one simple question…
Which MLB contract is the worst in baseball?
What Do You Think?
Do you agree with the fans who picked Anthony Rendon, or is another MLB player sitting on an even worse contract?
Drop your answer in the comments and tell us which contract you think has been the biggest disappointment—and why.
